DWI Sentencing Checklist
By Linda Atkinson
Executive Director
DWI Resource Center
latkinson@dwirc.org
Here’s a helpful tool for New Mexico judges….do they have what it takes to use it wisely?
The DWI Sentencing Checklist below should be reviewed and utilized by every judge in New Mexico that sentences DWI offenders. The checklist was put together by the National Center for State Courts and National Highway Safety Traffic Safety Administration.
DWI Sentencing Checklist[1]
The table below summarizes the evidence concerning various DWI sentencing options
Offender |
Sanction |
Effectiveness |
Comment |
First Conviction
|
Licensing | ||
Suspension/revocation (≥90 days; 30 days hard) |
Reduces alcohol-related fatalities 6%-19% (administrative license revocation) | One study showed it does not cause employment problems. | |
Vehicle Actions (For Very High BAC’s) |
|||
Impoundment/immobilization
|
Reduces recidivism by 40%-70%. | Immobilization may be more cost-effective. | |
Alcohol ignition interlocks
|
Effective while on vehicle.
|
Breath test failures in first few weeks are best predictor of recidivism. | |
License plate impoundment | Shown to be effective in MN. | More cost-efficient than impoundment | |
Assessment and Rehabilitation | |||
Treatment as appropriate to problem | Reduces recidivism by 7%-9%. | Should be paid by the offender when possible | |
Sentencing Options | |||
Electronic monitoring home confinement | Effective alternative to jail. Reduces recidivism by 33%. | Can be self-sufficient if paid by the offender | |
Fines | No studies of effectiveness found. | Sometimes used to pay for programs. | |
Licensing |
|||
MULTIPLE CONVICTIONS
MULTIPLE CONVICTIONS
|
Suspension/revocation (≥ 1 year) 30-90 days hard Remaining days on restricted license/work permit. | No studies found on the effects of license suspension on repeat offenders. General deterrent effect of 6%-19%.
|
Studies indicate 50%-70% of offenders continue to drive to some extent |
Vehicle Actions | |||
Impoundment/immobilization
|
Reduces recidivism by 40%-70%. | Immobilization may be more cost-effective. | |
Alcohol ignition interlocks
|
Reduces recidivism while on vehicle.
|
Breath test failures in first few weeks are best predictor of recidivism. | |
License plate impoundment | Shown to reduce recidivism in MN. | More cost-efficient than impoundment. | |
Assessment and Rehabilitation |
|||
Mandatory assessment of drinking problem and mandatory treatment
|
Reduces recidivism by 7%-9%.
|
Should be paid by the offender when possible.
|
|
Sentencing Options |
|||
Electronic monitoring and home confinement | Reduces recidivism by 33%. | Can be self-sufficient if paid by the offender | |
Intensive supervision probation | Reduces recidivism by 50%. | Should be at least partially funded by the offender | |
Special DWI facilities | Reduces recidivism by 75%. | ||
Day reporting center | Integrates offender back into society. | More cost-effective than jail. | |
Fines, reinstatement fees | No studies on effectiveness found | Helps pay for costs of other sanctions. | |
DWI court (e.g., frequent contact with judge; intensive supervision probation; treatment; random alcohol/drug testing; lifestyle changes; positive reinforcement) | Some courts reporting reductions in recidivism by 50% or greater. | Multiple funding sources available. NHTSA and the Bureau of Justice Assistance have a joint evaluation underway. | |
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
– Elie Wiesel
[1] The Courts’ Role in Reducing the Incidence of impaired Driving, a resource for general jurisdiction court judges, National Center for State Courts and National Highway Safety Traffic Safety Administration.